Priyatham S. Mettu, MD, is a Duke University retina specialist who is testing new treatments and imaging technologies for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). As a guest speaker at a recent BrightFocus Chat, AMD: Your Questions Answered, Dr. Mettu responded to a number of questions, many on the subject of eye injections as a treatment for wet AMD.
In wet AMD, abnormal blood vessels can grow behind the macula. Fragile vessels can leak fluid and blood, which distorts vision. The condition can be treated with injections of angiogenesis inhibitors into the eye, which blocks the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that promotes blood vessel growth. A patient might receive regular injections over a long period, which is why the question of side effects was on the mind of some Chat participants.
Treatment Safety and Side Effects
Mettu notes that, “on a short-term basis, the main side effects that patients can get are typically related to the injection, and that might involve a little bit of short-term discomfort at the site of the injection or a little bit of redness or bleeding.”
The news on long-term side effects is generally positive. “The fortunate thing is that if we’re talking about the health of the eye, the side effects of long-term sustained treatment are actually quite favorable,” notes Mettu. “For most patients, the treatment with anti-VEGF shots for many years is safe and very well tolerated.”
Injection medications have been around for more than twelve years, says Mettu, and “all of the available data looking at patients who’ve had treatment for seven to ten years suggest that patients can receive these injections with very few ill side effects.”
The “Treatment Burden”
Still, many Chat participants are interested in alternative treatments to “the dreaded needle,” as one caller put it. Mettu also acknowledges that there is a “treatment burden” with injections:
- On patients, who may have to come in frequently for shots, or
- On family members, who have to take a day off of work to accompany the patient, and
- Even on retina specialists, juggling a number of eye injection patients
Mettu predicts there will be a host of new treatment opportunities in the future, around extended-release treatments. The mechanism of action will be similar to some of our currently available treatments, but they will last longer, he says.
For injections, “the goal would be that instead of having to come in every month for a shot, you may come in once every six months to get a shot. That doesn’t quite take away the needle, but at least it decreases the frequency of it.”
There are other research initiatives looking into the possibility of eye drops for AMD treatment, notes Mettu, but that research is still in the very early stages.
Getting Enough Treatment
Other questions concerned when a person might stop injection treatments, or at least reduce their frequency, if vision has improved. Mettu cautioned against decreasing injection treatment prematurely.
“I think the biggest problem facing our patients is actually under-treatment, meaning that they’re not getting enough shots. All of the studies now show that, on average, patients need between six to eight shots a year. Some patients may need fewer, some patients more, but long-term, sustained treatment is important for disease control.
“When you stop the shots, for the vast majority of patients that increases the risk that vision loss will happen either gradually over time, or could happen suddenly in the event of having a significant bleed inside the eye. So, maintaining a regular schedule of treatment to suppress the disease is critically important for maintaining long-term good vision.”
Suppressing Wet AMD
Another way Mettu describes the goal of injections is to make Wet AMD go dormant with this treatment. That means:
- The disease is not active;
- There’s no fluid leakage;
- There’s no bleeding;
- The blood vessel underneath the retina is not getting bigger.
“Our strategy is typically to inject once a month for the first three months and then reevaluate and say, ‘Have we completely suppressed the disease activity, or is there still active disease?’ If we’ve suppressed the disease activity, we can gradually extend the interval between shots. That approach, used by most retina specialists, is called “treat and extend,” notes Mettu.
If there is still active disease after the initial three treatments, doctors consider alternative approaches, which vary by retina specialists. These may include switching to another type of anti-VEGF medication, or to certain types of laser treatments as an adjunct to other treatment.
While medical scientists search for more effective and less burdensome AMD treatments, Mettu reminds us of the purpose of eye injections for wet AMD:
“The long-term goal really is to try to use just enough treatment to suppress the disease and manage the treatment burden.”
- Promising New Treatments for AMD (Audio and Transcript)
- AMD: Your Questions Answered (Audio and Transcript)
- Injections for Wet Macular Degeneration: What to Expect (Article)
- How Effective are Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments? (Article)
- Macular Degeneration: Essential Facts (Publication)
- Macular Degeneration Toolkit (Helpful Information to Understand and Manage Macular Degeneration)
- BrightFocus Chats (Audio Discussions on Macular Degeneration)
This content was last updated on: May 14, 2018
The information provided here is a public service of the BrightFocus Foundation and should not in any way substitute for personalized advice of a qualified healthcare professional; it is not intended to constitute medical advice. Please consult your physician for personalized medical advice. BrightFocus Foundation does not endorse any medical product, therapy, or resources mentioned or listed in this article. All medications and supplements should only be taken under medical supervision. Also, although we make every effort to keep the medical information on our website updated, we cannot guarantee that the posted information reflects the most up-to-date research.
These articles do not imply an endorsement of BrightFocus by the author or their institution, nor do they imply an endorsement of the institution or author by BrightFocus.
Some of the content may be adapted from other sources, which will be clearly identified within the article.